- #Graphic card benchmark 2019 gtx970 32 bit
- #Graphic card benchmark 2019 gtx970 full
- #Graphic card benchmark 2019 gtx970 series
#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s.
#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s.
#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s. #13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s. #12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.013s. #11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s. #8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6279 +0.003s. #7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.014s. #2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13:05:42 +0200 +0.001s. #0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s. GeForce GTX 900 SeriesĬUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync, G-SYNC, SLI While gaming, the card only uses as much power as the Radeon R9 285 which is more than 35% slower on average. The Maxwell architecture is very power efficient. The GM204 supports CUDA, 3D Vision, PhysX, GeForce Experience, Surround, GameStream, GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive Vertical Sync / G-SYNC, SLI, DSR, MFAA and Virtual Reality latency improvements. The similar named mobile GeForce GTX 970M is clearly slower as it features only 1280 shader cores.ĭespite the unique memory configuration, the GTX 970 performs on average on par with the older GeForce GTX 780 Ti or a AMD Radeon R9 290X.
#Graphic card benchmark 2019 gtx970 full
This can lead to some stuttering or reduced frame rates in games that use the full 4 GB.
#Graphic card benchmark 2019 gtx970 32 bit
The graphics card is equipped with 4 GB GDDR5 (7 GHz effective). 3.5 GB of the 4 GB are connected with 224 Bit, the rest only with a 32 Bit interface. As the faster GTX 980, the GTX 970 uses the GM204 chip, but with reduced shaders (2048 vs. Anything below these cards is ripe for an upgrade.The Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 is a high end desktop graphics card based on the Maxwell architecture. Finally, the R9 380 and 380X typically beat the GTX 1050 Ti, while Nvidia GTX 960 and 950 offer nearly the same performance as the GTX 1050 Ti and 1050, respectively. The even older R9 290X is basically a tie with the R9 390, with the R9 290 dropping 10 percent (basically tying the GTX 970). The R9 390 is a bit slower (5-10 percent), but thanks to its 8GB VRAM, it's 10-15 percent faster than the GTX 970. The 980 also roughly matches the GTX 1060 6GB, along with the R9 390X. The R9 Fury and R9 Nano drop another 10-15 percent relative to the Fury X, with the Nano being very close to the GTX 980 in performance. The GTX 980 Ti is about 10 percent below the GTX 1070, and the R9 Fury X is about 5-10 percent slower than the 980 Ti. Going back another generation to Nvidia's 900-series and AMD's R9 series, things get a bit messier. The GTX 1070 meanwhile comes in about 5-8 percent below the RX Vega 56, a few percent ahead of the GTX 1660 Ti. The GTX 1080 comes in just ahead of the RX Vega 64, with the GTX 1070 Ti effectively tied with the Vega 64 (just a hair slower). The GTX 1080 Ti ranks just below the 2080, but ahead of the Radeon VII. If you have an older GPU and want to know where it sits in the list, here's the quick rundown of Nvidia's 10-series cards.
We also have a frequently-updated list of cheap graphics cards deals. If you're interested in more detailed comparisons, check out our best graphics cards guide. So there you have it-all the graphics cards you can buy right now, (roughly) ranked by performance. The specs may vary, depending on if you buy one of these or a variant made by GPU manufacturers like EVGA, MSI, or ASUS. Also, it’s important to note that the ranking are based on stock first-party hardware from AMD and Nvidia.
#Graphic card benchmark 2019 gtx970 series
The rankings are based on framerate tests on a series of popular games performed by our staff, as well as external market research. We start with the most powerful card on the market and work our way down the list of cards that are currently available new from retailers. Our graphics card rankings are very clear and very simple. It’s easy to tell that a RX 590 is better than an RX 580, but how do those compare to a Vega 64? Or a Radeon VII!? There’s a roman numeral in there! How does that help anyone? Meanwhile, AMD’s different card lines all have their own naming conventions. Nvidia now has three versions of its 20-series graphics cards-20XX, 20XX Super, and 20XX Ti-plus there are a whole range of low-mid range cards that don’t fit the naming convention like the 16. It’s harder than ever to know how cards fit into the history and evolution of the modern GPU.
0 kommentar(er)
